Even if it were law ,Ginder, the word stoic (in this case expensive with no gain) springs to mind.Please cite the relevant legislation.
Its not a matter of "if it were law", it is the law and a product that costs hundreds of pounds and last just over 12 months is not a reasonable period of time. As for the legislation please read up the Sale of Goods Act 1979. You have your full statutory rights under Civil Law to cover you, all you need to do is keep your receipt. http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consumers/fact-sheets/page38311.html
I am not sure that you have read this article yourself or you are cherry picking phrases to suit your interpretation however I shall pick out the bits which are relevant.
"• For up to six years after purchase (five years from discovery in Scotland) purchasers can demand damages (which a court would equate to the cost of a repair or replacement)."
This is a statute of limitation,not a warranty period.
and below this ,as explanation in frequently asked questions
Q3. Are all goods supposed to last six (or five) years?
No, that is the limit for bringing a court case in England and Wales (five years from the time of discovery in Scotland's case). An item only needs to last as long as it is reasonable to expect it to, taking into account all the factors. An oil filter would usually not last longer than a year but that would not mean it was unsatisfactory.
And then just to contradict your other statement:
"Q7. Do I have to produce a receipt to claim my rights?
No. In fact the trader doesn't have to give you a receipt in the first place so it would be unfair to say that you had to produce one. However, it might not be unreasonable for the shop to want some proof of purchase, so look to see if you have a cheque stub, bank statement, credit card slip etc., and this should be sufficient."
All the above in quotation marks are taken from the page you cited.Not sure how much plainer it can be.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.